Shlomi Lavi /
Mar 13, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Applicant Tracking or ProfileXT?
ProfileXT is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Applicant Tracking, and ProfileXT is rated higher (92/100) than Applicant Tracking (55/100). Applicant Tracking offers users more features (3) than ProfileXT (0).
Looking for the right Recruitment solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
ApplicantStack Vs. Profiles International
ApplicantStack: ApplicantStack is affordable and easy-to-use Applicant Tracking and Recruitment software that is designed for small to mid-size businesses and recruiters. With ApplicantStack you can create online job applications, manage resumes, create screening questionnaires, create a career site/job board, manage hiring workflow, search resumes, track complian...
Profiles International: We provide assessment solutions that help organizations select the right people for the right job and develop them to their full potential.
We assist clients throughout all phases of the employee life cycle to enhance the productivity and performance of individuals, teams, and organizations.
Who is more expensive? Applicant Tracking or ProfileXT?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Recruitment software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Applicant Tracking and ProfileXT.
Applicant Tracking price starts at $65 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Applicant Tracking Software is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Recruitment software. ProfileXT accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Applicant Tracking Software is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Recruitment software.
Bottom line: ProfileXT is more expensive than Applicant Tracking.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared Applicant Tracking Vs. ProfileXT based on some of the most important and required Recruitment features.
Applicant Tracking: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.
ProfileXT: We are still working to collect the list of features for ProfileXT.
Target customer size
Applicant Tracking's typical customers include: Start up, Small business, Medium business, Large business, The software is a viable product for businesses of all sizes with background in a variety of industries.