Compare Attendance on Demand and TalentBin - Jul 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Attendance on Demand or TalentBin?

TalentBin is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Attendance on Demand, and Attendance on Demand is rated higher (82/100) than TalentBin (80/100). TalentBin offers users more features (6) than Attendance on Demand (4).

Looking for the right Time Tracking solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Attendance on Demand Inc. Vs. Monster

Attendance on Demand Inc.: Attendance on Demand is a rapidly deployed, cloud-based time and attendance system that minimizes a company’s risk and technology investment while providing advanced features for securely managing labor data. With over 30 years in the time and attendance industry, the company’s founders have evolved product offerings from mechanical time clocks to ...

Monster: Monster Worldwide, Inc. (NYSE:MWW), is a global leader in successfully connecting job opportunities and people. Monster uses the world's most advanced technology to help people Find Better, matching job seekers to opportunities via digital, social and mobile solutions including monster.com®, our flagship website, and employers to the best talent u...

Who is more expensive? Attendance on Demand or TalentBin?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Time Tracking software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Attendance on Demand and TalentBin.

Attendance on Demand price starts at $2 per employee/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Attendance on Demand is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Time Tracking software. TalentBin price starts at $5,000 per year , When comparing TalentBin to its competitors, the software is rated 4 - lower than the average Time Tracking software cost.

Bottom line: TalentBin is more expensive than Attendance on Demand.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Attendance on Demand Vs. TalentBin based on some of the most important and required Time Tracking features.

Attendance on Demand: Employee Scheduling, Offline Timesheets, Online Timesheets, Attendance Tracking.

TalentBin: Recruiting Management, Resume Database, Applicant Tracking, Talent Management, Workflow Rules & Management.

Target customer size

Attendance on Demand's typical customers include: SMBs, Customers of the software include businesses of all sizes and a variety of types.