Compare CoConstruct and SharpeSoft Field Reporter - Jul 2022
Compare PricingWe publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - CoConstruct or SharpeSoft Field Reporter?
SharpeSoft Field Reporter is more expensive to implement (TCO) than CoConstruct, and CoConstruct is rated higher (97/100) than SharpeSoft Field Reporter (82/100). CoConstruct offers users more features (13) than SharpeSoft Field Reporter (9). There is a clear winner in this case and it is CoConstruct!
Looking for the right Construction solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
CoConstruct Vs. SharpeSoft Inc.
CoConstruct: Donny Wyatt started Co-construct after he and his wife had a "typical" custom homebuilding experience — and set out on a mission to ensure that no other home builder, remodeler, or clients would fall victim to the same hair-pulling, blood-pressure-raising, cash-sucking problems that he had. He started with that emotional passion as a frustrated ...
SharpeSoft Inc.: SharpeSoft Inc. was founded in 1986 by an estimator discouraged with the estimating software he found on the market. The programs available made the bidding process difficult and unnatural since they did not allow estimators to bid the way they were used to. Rather they required the user to follow a rigid format created by a software developer who ...
Who is more expensive? CoConstruct or SharpeSoft Field Reporter?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Construction software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for CoConstruct and SharpeSoft Field Reporter.
CoConstruct price starts at $99 per month , On a scale between 1 to 10 CoConstruct is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Construction software. SharpeSoft Field Reporter accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 CoConstruct is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Construction software.
Bottom line: SharpeSoft Field Reporter is more expensive than CoConstruct.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared CoConstruct Vs. SharpeSoft Field Reporter based on some of the most important and required Construction features.
CoConstruct: this software is considered "feature-rich" with more than 10 important features, here is a partial list: Budget & Expense Management, Issue Tracking, Project Management, Scheduling, Task Management, Change Orders, Contract Management, Cost Management.
SharpeSoft Field Reporter: Accounting Management, Bidding, Cost Management, Document Management, Equipment Management.
Target customer size
CoConstruct is best suited for small, medium, and large businesses in the building, construction, repair, plumbing, contracting, HVAC, electrical, engineering, architecture and similar industries. The software is a useful product for construction businesses of all sizes and a variety of types.
SharpeSoft Field Reporter
SharpeSoft Field Reporter is a construction management solution for businesses of all sizes. Its capabilities include accounting management, project management, estimating, integration, and others. The ...
PriceDemoCompare specifications
CoConstruct Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 97/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
Category: | Construction -> CoConstruct review |
Company: | CoConstruct |
Pricing: | starts at $99 per month |
Typical customers: | SMBs |
Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
Links: | CoConstruct review, CoConstruct pricing, CoConstruct alternatives |
SharpeSoft Field Reporter Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 82/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 6/10 - average cost |
Category: | Construction -> SharpeSoft Field Reporter review |
Company: | SharpeSoft Inc. |
Typical customers: | SMBs |
Platforms: | Desktop |
Links: | SharpeSoft Field Reporter review, SharpeSoft Field Reporter pricing, SharpeSoft Field Reporter alternatives |
Compare features
CoConstruct: 13 Features
SharpeSoft Field Reporter: 9 Features
Auditor - Shlomi Lavi
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.