Compare SharpeSoft Field Reporter and CoConstruct - Jul 2022
Compare PricingWe publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - SharpeSoft Field Reporter or CoConstruct?
SharpeSoft Field Reporter is more expensive to implement (TCO) than CoConstruct, and CoConstruct is rated higher (97/100) than SharpeSoft Field Reporter (82/100). CoConstruct offers users more features (13) than SharpeSoft Field Reporter (9). There is a clear winner in this case and it is CoConstruct!
Looking for the right Construction solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
SharpeSoft Inc. Vs. CoConstruct
SharpeSoft Inc.: SharpeSoft Inc. was founded in 1986 by an estimator discouraged with the estimating software he found on the market. The programs available made the bidding process difficult and unnatural since they did not allow estimators to bid the way they were used to. Rather they required the user to follow a rigid format created by a software developer who ...
CoConstruct: Donny Wyatt started Co-construct after he and his wife had a "typical" custom homebuilding experience — and set out on a mission to ensure that no other home builder, remodeler, or clients would fall victim to the same hair-pulling, blood-pressure-raising, cash-sucking problems that he had. He started with that emotional passion as a frustrated ...
Who is more expensive? SharpeSoft Field Reporter or CoConstruct?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Construction software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for SharpeSoft Field Reporter and CoConstruct.
SharpeSoft Field Reporter accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 SharpeSoft Field Reporter is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Construction software. CoConstruct price starts at $99 per month , When comparing CoConstruct to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Construction software cost.
Bottom line: SharpeSoft Field Reporter is more expensive than CoConstruct.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared SharpeSoft Field Reporter Vs. CoConstruct based on some of the most important and required Construction features.
SharpeSoft Field Reporter: Accounting Management, Bidding, Cost Management, Document Management, Equipment Management, Estimating, Procurement, Project Management.
CoConstruct: Budget & Expense Management, Issue Tracking, Project Management, Scheduling, Task Management.
Target customer size
The software is a useful product for construction businesses of all sizes and a variety of types. CoConstruct is best suited for small, medium, and large businesses in the building, construction, repair, plumbing, contracting, HVAC, electrical, engineering, architecture and similar industries.
CoConstruct
starts at $99 per month
CoConstruct software is a cloud-based construction management solution. The software offers a number of features that include simplified bidding tool that helps create bids in minutes and estimate data.
PriceDemoCompare specifications
SharpeSoft Field Reporter Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 82/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 6/10 - average cost |
Category: | Construction -> SharpeSoft Field Reporter review |
Company: | SharpeSoft Inc. |
Typical customers: | SMBs |
Platforms: | Desktop |
Links: | SharpeSoft Field Reporter review, SharpeSoft Field Reporter pricing, SharpeSoft Field Reporter alternatives |
CoConstruct Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 97/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
Category: | Construction -> CoConstruct review |
Company: | CoConstruct |
Pricing: | starts at $99 per month |
Typical customers: | SMBs |
Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
Links: | CoConstruct review, CoConstruct pricing, CoConstruct alternatives |
Compare features
SharpeSoft Field Reporter: 9 Features
CoConstruct: 13 Features
Auditor - Shlomi Lavi
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.