Compare eSUB and B2W Track - Jun 2022
Compare PricingWe publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - eSUB or B2W Track?
B2W Track is more expensive to implement (TCO) than eSUB, and eSUB is rated higher (97/100) than B2W Track (83/100). eSUB offers users more features (17) than B2W Track (6). There is a clear winner in this case and it is eSUB!
Looking for the right Construction solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
eSUB Vs. B2W Software
eSUB: About 30 years ago eSUB originated as an off shoot of a consulting firm who represented Specialty Contractors to create construction claims for retroactive payment for work they had already performed. Managing project documents back then was inefficient, subject to mistakes and omissions. The familiar way was to manually update multiple programs...
B2W Software: Headquartered in Portsmouth, New Hampshire, B2W Software is a premier provider of enterprise-class construction software, services and solutions that is redefining the future for streamlined operations. B2W Software solutions effectively leverage the latest technologies into a unified system approach for estimating and bidding, field tracking and a...
Who is more expensive? eSUB or B2W Track - Field Tracking and Analysis?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Construction software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for eSUB and B2W Track - Field Tracking and Analysis.
eSUB accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 eSUB is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Construction software. B2W Track - Field Tracking and Analysis accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 eSUB is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Construction software.
Bottom line: B2W Track - Field Tracking and Analysis is more expensive than eSUB.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared eSUB Vs. B2W Track based on some of the most important and required Construction features.
eSUB: this software is considered "feature-rich" with more than 10 important features, here is a partial list: Mobile Access, Telephone Customer Support, Web Hosted Solution, Document Management, Resource Management, Project Collaboration, Issue Management, Project Portfolio Management.
B2W Track - Field Tracking and Analysis: Mobile Access, Employee Onboarding, Budget & Expense Management, Issue Tracking, Project Budgeting.
Target customer size
eSUB is specifically designed for subcontractors running a small and mid-size business. and B2W Track - Field Tracking and Analysis's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.
Compare specifications
eSUB Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 97/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
Category: | Construction -> eSUB review |
Company: | eSUB |
Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
Links: | eSUB review, eSUB pricing, eSUB alternatives |
B2W Track Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 83/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 8/10 - high cost |
Category: | Construction -> B2W Track review |
Company: | B2W Software |
Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
Links: | B2W Track review, B2W Track pricing, B2W Track alternatives |
Compare features
eSUB: 17 Features
B2W Track - Field Tracking and Analysis: 6 Features
Auditor - Shlomi Lavi
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.