Compare FinancialForce HCM and Viewpoint - Mar 2022

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Mar 12, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - FinancialForce HCM or Viewpoint?

Viewpoint is more expensive to implement (TCO) than FinancialForce HCM, and FinancialForce HCM is rated higher (92/100) than Viewpoint (78/100). Both tools offer the same amount of features.

Looking for the right Human Resources solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Financial Force Vs. Viewpoint Construction Software

Financial Force: FinancialForce.com is the cloud applications company. We focus 100% on building business applications for Force.com, the world’s leading cloud computing platform from salesforce.com. Our applications include Accounting, Billing, Professional Services Automation (PSA) and Services Resource Planning (SRP). We serve fast-growing organizations as well...

Viewpoint Construction Software: Viewpoint Construction Software has translated over 30 years of intense focus and collaboration with the construction industry into a rock-solid software platform that helps construction professionals efficiently manage all areas of finance and operations.San Antonio, TX – March 19th, 2013 – Viewpoint Construction Software®, providing construction ...

Who is more expensive? FinancialForce HCM or Viewpoint For Project Collaboration?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Human Resources software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for FinancialForce HCM and Viewpoint For Project Collaboration.

FinancialForce HCM price starts at $9,000 per year , On a scale between 1 to 10 FinancialForce HCM is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Human Resources software. Viewpoint For Project Collaboration price starts at $10,000 per license , When comparing Viewpoint For Project Collaboration to its competitors, the software is rated 6 - similar to the average Human Resources software cost.

Bottom line: Viewpoint For Project Collaboration is more expensive than FinancialForce HCM.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared FinancialForce HCM Vs. Viewpoint based on some of the most important and required Human Resources features.

FinancialForce HCM: HR Management, Payroll, Performance Record, Recruiting, Timesheet.

Viewpoint For Project Collaboration: Collaboration, Document Management, Project Management, Resource Management, Risk Management.

Target customer size

FinancialForce HCM is best for SMBs engages in several industries, including pharmaceuticals, accounting, legal, advertising, insurance, automotive, hospitality, banking, healthcare, broadcasting, engineering, business process outsourcing, e-commerce, and engineering. Viewpoint is a good fit for any business size in the construction industry.



FinancialForce HCM

ITQlick rating
(3.1/5)

starts at $9,000 per year

FinancialForce HCM (Human Capital Management) is a fully integrated software solution that helps businesses manage their current and incoming employees, from recruitment until their retirement. The software inc...

Categories: Human Resources, Applicant Tracking, Attendance Tracking, Benefits Administration.

Viewpoint

ITQlick rating
(3.7/5)

starts at $10,000 per license

Viewpoint For Project Collaboration is a project management and construction software for small and medium companies. Its key features include building information modeling, estimating, business intelligence an...

Categories: Construction, Capital Program Management, Construction Apps, Construction Program & Portfolio Management, Electrician Apps.

Compare specifications

Compare features

FinancialForce HCM: 5 Features

HR Management
Payroll
Performance Record
Recruiting
Timesheet

Viewpoint For Project Collaboration: 5 Features

Collaboration
Document Management
Project Management
Resource Management
Risk Management
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
Financia...
ITQlick rating
3.1/5
Score
92/100
Pricing
2.2/10
License pricing
$9,000 per year
Functionality
23
Compare
Viewpoin...
ITQlick rating
3.7/5
Score
78/100
Pricing
7/10
License pricing
$10,000 per license
Functionality
26
Gusto
ITQlick rating
4.7/5
Score
99/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
$39 per month
Functionality
20
Review
Workforc...
ITQlick rating
4.1/5
Score
98/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
$6 per employee/month
Functionality
32
Workday ...
ITQlick rating
4.3/5
Score
98/100
Pricing
10/10
License pricing
$45 per employee/month
Functionality
3

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.