Compare Float and Moovila - Apr 2024
Compare PricingWe publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Float or Moovila?
Moovila is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Float, and Float is rated higher (85/100) than Moovila (82/100). Moovila offers users more features (6) than Float (5).
Looking for the right Project Resource Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Float Vs. Moovila
Float: Having worked in ad agencies big and small since the mid-2000's, our team were constantly challenged with the age-old question: who's working on what and when? With multiple projects, shifting deadlines, changing availabilities and a range of skill sets, we needed a tool that could centralize all of this information and handle a team in constant fl...
Moovila: Moovila automates mundane task work, optimizes resource management, and monitors risk 24/7 so you can prioritize delivering value over managing fire drills.
Who is more expensive? Float or Moovila?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Project Resource Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Float and Moovila.
Float price starts at $6 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Float is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Project Resource Management software. Moovila price starts at $24 per user/month , When comparing Moovila to its competitors, the software is rated 4 - lower than the average Project Resource Management software cost.
Bottom line: Float cost is around the same cost of Moovila.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared Float Vs. Moovila based on some of the most important and required Project Resource Management features.
Float: Project Management, Project Budgeting, Project Billing, Cash flow/cash budget, Forecasting.
Moovila: Communications, Budget & Expense Management, Collaboration, Project Budgeting, Billing & Invoicing.
Target customer size
Float's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, and Moovila's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.
Compare specifications
Float Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 85/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 4/10 - average cost |
Category: | Project Resource Management -> Float review |
Company: | Float |
Pricing: | starts at $6 per user/month |
Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
Links: | Float review, Float pricing, Float alternatives |
Moovila Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 82/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 4/10 - average cost |
Category: | Project Resource Management -> Moovila review |
Company: | Moovila |
Pricing: | starts at $24 per user/month |
Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Mobile, Cloud |
Links: | Moovila review, Moovila pricing, Moovila alternatives |
Compare features
Float: 5 Features
Moovila: 6 Features
Auditor - Shlomi Lavi
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.