Shlomi Lavi /
Oct 22, 2023
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Fountain or fishtank?
fishtank is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Fountain, and Fountain is rated higher (97/100) than fishtank (62/100). Fountain offers users more features (8) than fishtank (0). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Fountain!
Looking for the right Applicant Tracking solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Fountain Vs. graylink
Fountain: With Fountains automation abilities you can simply set your hiring preferences and requirements. Spend more time with candidates and less on scheduling interviews and sending reminders.
graylink: Established in 2002, we’re a team of highly talented, motivated and capable people. Our primary focus is developing secure, useful and usable software for corporate recruitment. We’re privately owned. Our head office is in Cape Town, South Africa and we have channel partners in select markets worldwide.
Whilst our market focus is predominantly E...
Who is more expensive? Fountain or fishtank?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Applicant Tracking software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Fountain and fishtank.
Fountain price starts at $49 per month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Fountain is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Applicant Tracking software. fishtank accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Fountain is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Applicant Tracking software.
Bottom line: fishtank is more expensive than Fountain.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared Fountain Vs. fishtank based on some of the most important and required Applicant Tracking features.
Fountain: Workflow, Human Resources, Applicant Tracking, Document Management, Recruiting Management, Resume Database, Electronic Workflow, Product Lifecycle Management.
fishtank: We are still working to collect the list of features for fishtank.
Target customer size
Fountain's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, Customers of the software include businesses of all sizes and a variety of types.