Shlomi Lavi / Jul 15, 2020
We publish unbiased reviews, our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. Learn more in our advertiser disclosure.
HARP is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Therabill, Therabill is rated higher (94/100) than HARP (92/100). Therabill offers more features (3) to their users than HARP (0). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Therabill!
Looking for the right Medical Billing solution for your business? buyers like you are primarily concerned about the real total implementation cost (TCO), full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, pros and cons. In this article we compare between the 2 software products:
Quadax: From the very beginning, Quadax has embraced innovation. The quest for new technologies, process improvements, and superior customer service has been a driving force since our founding in 1973. Although the healthcare billing industry has undergone staggering changes over the last forty years, Quadax has continued to thrive because we understand wh...
Therabill: Our mission is simple: To maintain a simple and affordable therapy practice management solution. "When I first signed up, I was unsure of whether Therabill would meet my needs. The price was much lower than any other software I had looked at. After using Therabill, I have found that Therabill has all of the features that I need. I am quite im...
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Medical Billing software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance & support and other related services. When calculating the TCO it's important to add all of these "hidden cost" as well. We prepared a TCO calculator for HARP and Therabill.
HARP price Starting from $49 per month , on a scale between 1 to 10 HARP is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Medical Billing software. Therabill price starts at $149 per provider , when comparing Therabill to their competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Medical Billing software cost.
Bottom line: HARP is more expensive than Therabill.
As with any business software solutions, it’s important to consider the features & functionality. The tool should support the processes, workflows, reports and needs that matter to your team. To help you evaluate this, we've compared HARP Vs. Therabill based on some of the most important and required Medical Billing features. HARP: We are still working to collect the list of features for HARP. Therabill: Billing & Invoicing, Appointment Management, HIPAA Compliant.
HARP's typical customers include: SMBs, Therabill is suitable for solo therapists and group practices and also supports managing multiple offices.
Starting from $49 per month
HARP (Health Accounts Receivable Processor) is a cloud-hosted and on-premise medical billing platform that is built to support small and medium-sized medical practices. The software is tailored to handle the bi...
Compare Pricing| ITQlick Score: | 92/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: | (5/5) |
| Pricing: | 4/10 - average cost |
| Category: | Medical Billing -> HARP |
| Company: | Quadax |
| Typical customers: | SMBs |
| Platforms: | Desktop, Cloud |
| Links: | HARP review, HARP pricing, HARP alternatives |
| ITQlick Score: | 94/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: | (4.4/5) |
| Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
| Category: | Medical Billing -> Therabill |
| Company: | Therabill |
| Pricing: | starts at $149 per provider |
| Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
| Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
| Links: | Therabill review, Therabill pricing, Therabill alternatives |
Shlomi holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information System Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 15 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant, and implementation expert for small, medium and large size (global) companies.