Compare iRecruit and Workable - Oct 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - iRecruit or Workable?

iRecruit is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Workable, and Workable is rated higher (96/100) than iRecruit (80/100). Workable offers users more features (17) than iRecruit (12). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Workable!

Looking for the right Applicant Tracking solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Cost Management Services, LLC Vs. Workable

Cost Management Services, LLC: CMS - Cost Management Services, LLC founded in 1997, focuses on developing and providing Employment Management Solutions for business across North America, Canada, Guam and the Virgin Islands. Located in Farmington, CT, our commitment to excellence and customer support is paramount.

Workable: For years, we recruited for fast-growing companies. Went through thousands of resumes, down bottomless mail threads and countless job boards, each with its own posting structure. Roughed it with tedious applicant tracking software, the obligatory excel files on-the-side and the impossible coordination of interviews and feedback. At some point, i...

Who is more expensive? iRecruit or Workable?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Applicant Tracking software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for iRecruit and Workable.

iRecruit price starts at $199 per month + $495 one time set up fee , On a scale between 1 to 10 iRecruit is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Applicant Tracking software. Workable price starts at $129 per job/month , When comparing Workable to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Applicant Tracking software cost.

Bottom line: iRecruit is more expensive than Workable.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared iRecruit Vs. Workable based on some of the most important and required Applicant Tracking features.

iRecruit: this software is considered "feature-rich" with more than 10 important features, here is a partial list: HR Management, Payroll, Recruiting, Software Customization, Applicant Tracking, Document Management, Email Integration, Mobile Access.

Workable: Employee Self-Service, HR Management, Payroll, Performance Record, Recruiting.

Target customer size

iRecruit extends its applicant tracking and recruitment solutions to companies of any size. Workable is a cross industry product focused on small and medium sized businesses.