Compare MACH and Athenahealth - Feb 2023

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - MACH or Athenahealth?

Athenahealth is more expensive to implement (TCO) than MACH, and Athenahealth is rated higher (96/100) than MACH (80/100). Athenahealth offers users more features (16) than MACH (0).

Looking for the right Facilities Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

MACH Energy Vs. Athenahealth

MACH Energy: MACH Energy is modern energy management software for commercial buildings. Our intuitive and mobile analytics and powerful reporting tools make your job easier and increase building value.

Athenahealth: athenahealth delivers cloud-based services for EHR, practice management and care coordination. Our mission is to be caregivers' most trusted service, helping them do well doing the right thing.

Who is more expensive? MACH Energy or Athenahealth?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Facilities Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for MACH Energy and Athenahealth.

MACH Energy accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 MACH Energy is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Facilities Management software. Athenahealth price starts at $140 per provider/month + 4% to 7% , When comparing Athenahealth to its competitors, the software is rated 4 - lower than the average Facilities Management software cost.

Bottom line: Athenahealth is more expensive than MACH Energy.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared MACH Vs. Athenahealth based on some of the most important and required Facilities Management features.

MACH Energy: We are still working to collect the list of features for MACH Energy.

Athenahealth: Security, Accounting & Finance, Billing & Invoicing, Email, Task Management.

Target customer size

MACH Energy's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses,

Athenahealth's medical software is primarily designed for medical practices, including primary care physicians, specialists, and small to mid-size practices.