Compare MDConnection and Kareo - Mar 2023

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Mar 01, 2023

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - MDConnection or Kareo?

MDConnection is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Kareo, and MDConnection is rated higher (92/100) than Kareo (90/100). Kareo offers users more features (6) than MDConnection (4).

Looking for the right Practice Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

La Jolla Digital, LLC Vs. Kareo

La Jolla Digital, LLC: La Jolla Digital, LLC is a premier provider of HIPAA compliant Internet-based medical practice management solutions, and is the creator of MDConnection. La Jolla Digital’s products are designed to fully automate the workflow for every type of environment including small practices, hospitals, medical billers, and urgent care facilities. The company’...

Kareo: Since 2004, Kareo medical office software and services have been purpose-built with small practices in mind. From administration, to electronic health records, to billing and collections, we streamline and simplify operations so doctors can spend more time practicing medicine. And those minutes and hours we give back make a big difference. That’s w...

Who is more expensive? MDConnection or Kareo?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Practice Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for MDConnection and Kareo.

MDConnection price starts at $199 per provider/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 MDConnection is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Practice Management software. Kareo price starts at $349 per provider/month + 4% - 9% (collections) , When comparing Kareo to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Practice Management software cost.

Bottom line: MDConnection cost is around the same cost of Kareo.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared MDConnection Vs. Kareo based on some of the most important and required Practice Management features.

MDConnection: Multi Language, HIPAA Compliant, Patient portal, Medical.

Kareo: Payment Management, Billing & Invoicing, Scheduling, Compliance , Barcode Scanning.

Target customer size

MDConnection Practice Management software caters to a wide range of customers in the healthcare industry.

Kareo Medical Software serves a wide range of healthcare professionals, including physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, therapists, and medical billing companies.



MDConnection

ITQlick rating
(4.6/5)

starts at $199 per provider/month

MDConnection is a cloud-based medical practice management solution that is developed in order to be used in improving the efficiency of all practices that are carried out in the healthcare and medical industry....

Categories: Medical, Allergy EMR, Chiropractic, Dermatology EMR.

Kareo

ITQlick rating
(4.1/5)

starts at $349 per provider/month + 4% - 9% (collections)

Kareo EHR is a web-based Meaningful Use Stage 2 certified medical electronic health record (EHR) and practice management solution designed for physicians in small practices and billing companies.

Categories: Billing & Invoicing, Payment Processing, Recurring invoicing, Compliance , SSO: Single sign on.

Compare specifications

Kareo Specifications

ITQlick Score: 90/100
ITQlick Rating:
Pricing: 2/10 - low cost
Category: Medical -> Kareo review
Company: Kareo
Pricing: starts at $349 per provider/month + 4% - 9% (collections)
Typical customers: Small, medium and large size businesses
Platforms: Desktop, Mobile, Cloud
Links: Kareo review, Kareo pricing, Kareo alternatives

Compare features

MDConnection: 4 Features

Multi Language
HIPAA Compliant
Patient portal
Medical

Kareo: 6 Features

Payment Management
Billing & Invoicing
Scheduling
Compliance
Barcode Scanning
Medical
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
MDConnection
ITQlick rating
4.6/5
Score
92/100
Pricing
2.4/10
License pricing
$199 per provider/month
Functionality
30
Compare
Kareo
ITQlick rating
4.1/5
Score
90/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
$349 per provider/month + 4% - 9% (collections)
Functionality
31
Review
CareClou...
ITQlick rating
4/5
Score
95/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
$349 per provider/month
Functionality
29
Intergy ...
ITQlick rating
4.4/5
Score
92/100
Pricing
6.4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
22
Edgemed ...
ITQlick rating
3.1/5
Score
86/100
Pricing
5.6/10
License pricing
$149 per user/month
Functionality
3

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.