Compare MG-Track and QAngio - Jun 2022

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Jun 02, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - MG-Track or QAngio?

QAngio is more expensive to implement (TCO) than MG-Track, QAngio is rated with the same score (88/100) as MG-Track (88/100). QAngio offers more features (1) to their users than MG-Track (0). There is a clear winner in this case and it is QAngio!

Looking for the right Radiology Systems (RIS) solution for your business? buyers like you are primarily concerned about the real total implementation cost (TCO), full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, pros and cons. In this article we compare between the 2 software products:

How Atirix Medical Systems compares with Medis medical imaging systems?

Atirix Medical Systems: Fluoroscopy is a critical element in many complex medical interventions. However, modern fluoroscopes have become increasingly challenging to evaluate for imaging performance, fluoroscope constancy, and procedure readiness.

Medis medical imaging systems: MEDIS, a leading developer and supplier of software applications for image-based diagnosis and quantitative assessment of cardiovascular disease, today announced that it acquired Advanced Medical Imaging Development S.r.l. (AMID), a developer and supplier specialized in cardiovascular mechanics and innovative image processing in ultrasound and othe...

Who's more expensive? MG-Track or QAngio XA?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Radiology Systems (RIS) software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance & support and other related services. When calculating the TCO it's important to add all of these "hidden cost" as well. We prepared a TCO calculator for MG-Track and QAngio XA.

MG-Track accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , on a scale between 1 to 10 MG-Track is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Radiology Systems (RIS) software. QAngio XA accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , on a scale between 1 to 10 MG-Track is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Radiology Systems (RIS) software.

Bottom line: MG-Track cost is around the same cost of QAngio XA.

Which software includes more/better features?

As with any business software solutions, it’s important to consider the features & functionality. The tool should support the processes, workflows, reports and needs that matter to your team. To help you evaluate this, we've compared MG-Track Vs. QAngio based on some of the most important and required Radiology Systems (RIS) features. MG-Track: We are still working to collect the list of features for MG-Track. QAngio XA: EDI.

Target customer size

MG-Track's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, and QAngio XA's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.

MG-Track

ITQlick rating
(3.6/5)

The MG-Track™ system is designed as a stand-alone medical audit and patient letter system for imaging centers, including stand-alone imaging centers, outpatient clinics, and hospitals, that want a tool to help ...

Categories: Radiology Systems (RIS).

QAngio XA

ITQlick rating
(5/5)

MEDIS, a leading developer and supplier of software applications for image-based diagnosis and quantitative assessment of cardiovascular disease, today announced that it acquired Advanced Medical Imaging Develo...

Categories: EDI, Image Fusion, Radiology Systems (RIS).

Compare specifications

Compare features

MG-Track: 0 Features

We are working to collect the list of features

QAngio XA: 1 Features

EDI
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
MG-Track
ITQlick rating
3.6/5
Score
88/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
3
Compare
QAngio
ITQlick rating
5/5
Score
88/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
4
Review
PDQuest
ITQlick rating
3.6/5
Score
89/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
3
VIS
ITQlick rating
4/5
Score
89/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
3
Review
ORS
ITQlick rating
5/5
Score
88/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
$1,360 per year
Functionality
3
Review

Author - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.