Compare QAngio and MG-Track - Feb 2023

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - QAngio or MG-Track?

MG-Track is more expensive to implement (TCO) than QAngio, and MG-Track is rated with the same score (88/100) as QAngio (88/100). QAngio offers users more features (1) than MG-Track (0). There is a clear winner in this case and it is QAngio!

Looking for the right Radiology Systems (RIS) solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Medis medical imaging systems Vs. Atirix Medical Systems

Medis medical imaging systems: MEDIS, a leading developer and supplier of software applications for image-based diagnosis and quantitative assessment of cardiovascular disease, today announced that it acquired Advanced Medical Imaging Development S.r.l. (AMID), a developer and supplier specialized in cardiovascular mechanics and innovative image processing in ultrasound and othe...

Atirix Medical Systems: Fluoroscopy is a critical element in many complex medical interventions. However, modern fluoroscopes have become increasingly challenging to evaluate for imaging performance, fluoroscope constancy, and procedure readiness.

Who is more expensive? QAngio XA or MG-Track?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Radiology Systems (RIS) software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for QAngio XA and MG-Track.

QAngio XA accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 QAngio XA is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Radiology Systems (RIS) software. MG-Track accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 QAngio XA is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Radiology Systems (RIS) software.

Bottom line: QAngio XA cost is around the same cost of MG-Track.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared QAngio Vs. MG-Track based on some of the most important and required Radiology Systems (RIS) features.

QAngio XA: EDI.

MG-Track: We are still working to collect the list of features for MG-Track.

Target customer size

QAngio XA's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses,

MG-Track Radiology Systems (RIS) Software is a radiology information management system designed to streamline the workflow of radiology departments and imaging centers.