Shlomi Lavi /
Jan 03, 2023
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Microsoft Project Server or Hubstaff?
Microsoft Project Server is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Hubstaff, and Hubstaff is rated higher (94/100) than Microsoft Project Server (71/100). Hubstaff offers users more features (10) than Microsoft Project Server (0). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Hubstaff!
Looking for the right Project Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Microsoft Vs. Hubstaff
Microsoft:
Microsoft Corporation is an American corporation that develops, manufactures, licenses and supports a wide range of products and services related to computing. The company was founded by Bill Gates and Paul Allen on April 4, 1975. Microsoft is the world's largest software maker measured by revenues.
Hubstaff: We provide a SAAS solution for Employee Productivity and time tracking. We specialize in servicing companies that have many virtual employees or a service related business where you must communicate hours worked to your clients. Hubstaff helps make this process automatic and accurate providing screenshots and exact detail of the work completed.
Who is more expensive? Microsoft Project Server or Hubstaff?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Project Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Microsoft Project Server and Hubstaff.
Microsoft Project Server price starts at $30 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Microsoft Project Server is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Project Management software. Hubstaff price starts at $7 per user/month , When comparing Hubstaff to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Project Management software cost.
Bottom line: Microsoft Project Server is more expensive than Hubstaff.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared Microsoft Project Server Vs. Hubstaff based on some of the most important and required Project Management features.
Microsoft Project Server: We are still working to collect the list of features for Microsoft Project Server.
Hubstaff: Mobile Access, Billing & Invoicing, Automatic Time Capture, Hourly Employee Tracking, Multiple Pay Rates.
Target customer size
Microsoft Project Server is typically used by organizations of all sizes as a project management tool. The software is a useful solution for businesses of all sizes and a variety of types.