Compare Nanigans and Amobee - Feb 2023

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Feb 03, 2023

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Nanigans or Amobee?

Amobee is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Nanigans, and Nanigans is rated higher (79/100) than Amobee (62/100).

Looking for the right Campaign Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Nanigans Vs. Amobee

Nanigans: Nanigans advertising automation software empowers in-house marketing teams to grow the revenue impact of their digital advertising. More than $600M in annualized ad spend is managed through Nanigans software by commerce companies worldwide that rely on Nanigans as a strategic lever of customer growth and revenue generation for their companies. Off...

Amobee: Amobee is a global marketing technology company that provides data driven cross channel digital advertising solutions for agencies, brands and publishers. We serve key marketing channels -- display, video, email and social -- across all devices, and among a select group of companies globally with ads API integration for Facebook, Twitter, Instagram...

Who is more expensive? Nanigans or Amobee?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Campaign Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Nanigans and Amobee.

Nanigans accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Nanigans is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Campaign Management software. Amobee accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Nanigans is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Campaign Management software.

Bottom line: Nanigans cost is around the same cost of Amobee.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Nanigans Vs. Amobee based on some of the most important and required Campaign Management features.

Nanigans: We are still working to collect the list of features for Nanigans.

Amobee: We are still working to collect the list of features for Amobee.

Target customer size

Nanigans's typical customers include: SMBs, and Amobee's target customer size include: SMBs.



Nanigans

ITQlick rating
(4/5)

Nanigans is a growing cloud-based Marketing software, it is designed to support small and medium size business. Nanigans received a rating of 4 from ITQlick team. The software cost is considered average (3/5) ...

Categories: Digital Advertising.

Amobee

ITQlick rating
(3.1/5)

Amobee is an award-winning cloud-based Marketing software, it is designed to support small and medium size business. Amobee received a rating of 3.1 from ITQlick team. The software cost is considered average (...

Categories: Marketing, Digital Advertising.

Compare specifications

Compare features

Nanigans: 0 Features

We are working to collect the list of features

Amobee: 0 Features

We are working to collect the information
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
Nanigans
ITQlick rating
4/5
Score
79/100
Pricing
6/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
3
Compare
Amobee
ITQlick rating
3.1/5
Score
62/100
Pricing
7/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
3
Review
Choozle
ITQlick rating
3.7/5
Score
81/100
Pricing
8.2/10
License pricing
$99 per month
Functionality
3
RedCappi
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
79/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
$10 per month
Functionality
9
AdGear T...
ITQlick rating
3.3/5
Score
77/100
Pricing
4.4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
3

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.