Compare QAngio and AbbaDox Rad - Jun 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - QAngio or AbbaDox Rad?

AbbaDox Rad is more expensive to implement (TCO) than QAngio, and QAngio is rated higher (88/100) than AbbaDox Rad (62/100). QAngio offers users more features (1) than AbbaDox Rad (0). There is a clear winner in this case and it is QAngio!

Looking for the right Radiology Systems (RIS) solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Medis medical imaging systems Vs. IDS AbbaDox

Medis medical imaging systems: MEDIS, a leading developer and supplier of software applications for image-based diagnosis and quantitative assessment of cardiovascular disease, today announced that it acquired Advanced Medical Imaging Development S.r.l. (AMID), a developer and supplier specialized in cardiovascular mechanics and innovative image processing in ultrasound and othe...

IDS AbbaDox: At IDS, our mission is to deliver cutting-edge cloud information management and technology solutions. Our cloud technology platform, AbbaDox, enables healthcare delivery organizations to become real-time health systems. It supports efforts to improve care quality, enhance patient safety and engagement, reduce costs, improve operational efficiency, ...

Who is more expensive? QAngio XA or AbbaDox Rad?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Radiology Systems (RIS) software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for QAngio XA and AbbaDox Rad.

QAngio XA accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 QAngio XA is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Radiology Systems (RIS) software. AbbaDox Rad accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 QAngio XA is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Radiology Systems (RIS) software.

Bottom line: QAngio XA cost is around the same cost of AbbaDox Rad.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared QAngio Vs. AbbaDox Rad based on some of the most important and required Radiology Systems (RIS) features.

QAngio XA: EDI.

AbbaDox Rad: We are still working to collect the list of features for AbbaDox Rad.

Target customer size

QAngio XA's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, The typical customers using Abbadox Rad are the radiologists and other healthcare professionals working in healthcare environment of small business and medium-sized business as well as large enterprises harnessing the benefits from industry sector of IT and other information related service, particularly in the medical practice.