Compare QAngio and VIS - Jun 2022

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Jun 02, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - QAngio or VIS?

VIS is more expensive to implement (TCO) than QAngio, and VIS is rated higher (89/100) than QAngio (88/100). QAngio offers users more features (1) than VIS (0).

Looking for the right Radiology Systems (RIS) solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Medis medical imaging systems Vs. VEPRO

Medis medical imaging systems: MEDIS, a leading developer and supplier of software applications for image-based diagnosis and quantitative assessment of cardiovascular disease, today announced that it acquired Advanced Medical Imaging Development S.r.l. (AMID), a developer and supplier specialized in cardiovascular mechanics and innovative image processing in ultrasound and othe...

VEPRO: VEPRO is one of the leading IT companies in the health-care sector; our success is due to our employees, our international customers and our own “Made in Germany” product and software development. With a 30-year history in the national and international solutions field, we are one of the most experienced providers in the health-care market. A p...

Who is more expensive? QAngio XA or VIS - VEPRO Information System RIS?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Radiology Systems (RIS) software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for QAngio XA and VIS - VEPRO Information System RIS.

QAngio XA accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 QAngio XA is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Radiology Systems (RIS) software. VIS - VEPRO Information System RIS accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 QAngio XA is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Radiology Systems (RIS) software.

Bottom line: QAngio XA cost is around the same cost of VIS - VEPRO Information System RIS.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared QAngio Vs. VIS based on some of the most important and required Radiology Systems (RIS) features.

QAngio XA: EDI.

VIS - VEPRO Information System RIS: We are still working to collect the list of features for VIS - VEPRO Information System RIS.

Target customer size

QAngio XA's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, and VIS - VEPRO Information System RIS's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.

QAngio XA

ITQlick rating
(5/5)

MEDIS, a leading developer and supplier of software applications for image-based diagnosis and quantitative assessment of cardiovascular disease, today announced that it acquired Advanced Medical Imaging Develo...

Categories: EDI, Image Fusion, Radiology Systems (RIS).

VIS - VEPRO Information System RIS

ITQlick rating
(4/5)

For 38 years, VEPRO has been one of the most experienced and innovative eHealth companies for PACS - RIS - Cloud Videoconferencing Solutions - Referral and Patient Portals. For many years now, thousands of sat...

Categories: PACS Systems, Patient Scheduling, Radiology Systems (RIS).

Compare specifications

Compare features

QAngio XA: 1 Features

EDI

VIS - VEPRO Information System RIS: 0 Features

We are working to collect the information
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
QAngio
ITQlick rating
5/5
Score
88/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
4
Review
Compare
VIS
ITQlick rating
4/5
Score
89/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
3
Review
PDQuest
ITQlick rating
3.6/5
Score
89/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
3
ORS
ITQlick rating
5/5
Score
88/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
$1,360 per year
Functionality
3
Review
MG-Track
ITQlick rating
3.6/5
Score
88/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
3

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.