Compare Recruiterflow and OnBlick ATS - Oct 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Recruiterflow or OnBlick ATS?

OnBlick ATS is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Recruiterflow, and Recruiterflow is rated higher (84/100) than OnBlick ATS (80/100). Both tools offer the same amount of features.

Looking for the right Recruitment solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Recruiterflow Vs. Onblick

Recruiterflow: Recruiterflow captures all the candidate data from your inbox so that all the data is always there whenever you need it. Drag and drop files to upload on candidate profile Your recruiting assistant inside your inbox for maximum productivity Never search to understand the context of a conversation. It is always there!

Onblick: OnBlick HR keeps your company compliant by digitizing I9 Form, I-983 Form and PAFs. Based on your hiring practices it also recommends matching SOC codes and Wage levels for the LCA.

Who is more expensive? Recruiterflow or OnBlick ATS?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Recruitment software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Recruiterflow and OnBlick ATS.

Recruiterflow price starts at $75 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Recruiterflow is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Recruitment software. OnBlick ATS price Has a free version , When comparing OnBlick ATS to its competitors, the software is rated 6 - similar to the average Recruitment software cost.

Bottom line: OnBlick ATS is more expensive than Recruiterflow.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Recruiterflow Vs. OnBlick ATS based on some of the most important and required Recruitment features.

Recruiterflow: Workflow, Recruiting Management, Resume Database, Applicant Tracking, Configurable Workflow.

OnBlick ATS: Workflow, Recruiting Management, Resume Database, Applicant Tracking, Configurable Workflow.

Target customer size

Recruiterflow's typical customers include: Small businesses and start ups, and OnBlick ATS's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.