Compare Rippling and UMANA - Jul 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Rippling or UMANA?

UMANA is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Rippling, and Rippling is rated higher (88/100) than UMANA (82/100). UMANA offers users more features (9) than Rippling (0).

Looking for the right Payroll solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Rippling Vs. Carver Technologies

Rippling: Rippling makes it unbelievably easy to manage your teams payroll, benefits, computers, and apps — all in one, modern platform.

Carver Technologies: UMANA designs, adapts and implements top of the line, time, human resources and payroll management software for medium-sized businesses. Carver technologies has its head office located in downtown Montreal, and a client base of organizations working in a wide variety of fields such as research , government, municipalities, museums and manufacturing...

Who is more expensive? Rippling or UMANA?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Payroll software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Rippling and UMANA.

Rippling price starts at $8 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Rippling is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Payroll software. UMANA accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Rippling is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Payroll software.

Bottom line: UMANA is more expensive than Rippling.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Rippling Vs. UMANA based on some of the most important and required Payroll features.

Rippling: We are still working to collect the list of features for Rippling.

UMANA: Benefits Administration, Employee Self-Service, Payroll, Timesheet, Human Resources.

Target customer size

Rippling's typical customers include: SMBs, and UMANA's target customer size include: Medium and large size businesses.