Compare Synchroteam and Dataforma - Mar 2022

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Mar 24, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Synchroteam or Dataforma?

Synchroteam is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Dataforma, and Dataforma is rated higher (94/100) than Synchroteam (75/100). Dataforma offers users more features (11) than Synchroteam (10). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Dataforma!

Looking for the right Booking and scheduling solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Synchroteam Vs. Dataforma Inc.

Synchroteam: The history of Synchroteam starts with mobile terminals, called "personal assistants" at the time, with one objective: to make business data available to mobile users when they are away from their computer. Since the creation of Synchroteam in 2000, we have earned the confidence of many large companies through our ability to manage information...

Dataforma Inc.: Dataforma understands that good, long term business relationships are built on solid partnerships, not transaction-driven sales. If you don't succeed, we don't succeed. That's why we have an in-house consulting team dedicated serving YOU, our partner. We want our partners to have the ability to take advantage of all Dataforma has to offer. We are d...

Who is more expensive? Synchroteam or Dataforma?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Booking and scheduling software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Synchroteam and Dataforma.

Synchroteam price starts at $24 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Synchroteam is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Booking and scheduling software. Dataforma price starts at $69.99 per user/month , When comparing Dataforma to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Booking and scheduling software cost.

Bottom line: Synchroteam is more expensive than Dataforma.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Synchroteam Vs. Dataforma based on some of the most important and required Booking and scheduling features.

Synchroteam: Billing & Invoicing, Time Tracking, Scheduling, Custom User Interface, Customizable Fields, Customizable Functionality, Customizable Reports, Maintenance Management.

Dataforma: Contract Management, Accounting Management, Bidding, Change Orders, Contract Management.

Target customer size

Synchroteam offers its incredible features-including Scheduling and Tracking; among others to businesses. Dataforma business management system is specifically designed for roofing contractors handling both residential and commercial projects.

Synchroteam

ITQlick rating
(4.5/5)

starts at $24 per user/month

Synchroteam is a cloud-based field service management solution designed to help the user manage the mobile workforce. Some of its core features include job management, field tracking, and schedule & dispatch an...

Categories: Billing & Invoicing, Digital Signature, Field Service, Field Service - HVAC.

Dataforma

ITQlick rating
(4.3/5)

starts at $69.99 per user/month

Dataforma software is a web-hosted field service management solution that is integrated with scheduling, GPS Tracking and invoicing tools for contractors. Originally the platform was built specifically for roof...

Categories: Construction, Construction Apps, Roofing Contractor, Web Based Construction, Customer Relationship Management.

Compare specifications

Compare features

Synchroteam: 10 Features

Billing & Invoicing
Time Tracking
Scheduling
Custom User Interface
Customizable Fields
Customizable Functionality
Customizable Reports
Maintenance Management
Mobile Access
Work Order Management

Dataforma: 11 Features

Contract Management
Accounting Management
Bidding
Change Orders
Contract Management
Cost Management
Document Management
Equipment Management
Procurement
Project Management
Service Management
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
Synchroteam
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
75/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
$24 per user/month
Functionality
27
Compare
Dataforma
ITQlick rating
4.3/5
Score
94/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
$69.99 per user/month
Functionality
26
MINDBODY
ITQlick rating
3.9/5
Score
94/100
Pricing
8/10
License pricing
$159 per month
Functionality
11
SERVICE ...
ITQlick rating
3.6/5
Score
90/100
Pricing
5.8/10
License pricing
$795 per license
Functionality
7
Full Sla...
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
89/100
Pricing
6.8/10
License pricing
$29.95 per user/month
Functionality
6

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.