Compare Trakstar and Gusto - Mar 2022

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Mar 19, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn more by reading our advertiser disclosure.

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Trakstar or Gusto?

Trakstar is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Gusto, Gusto is rated higher (99/100) than Trakstar (91/100). Gusto offers more features (9) to their users than Trakstar (6). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Gusto!

Looking for the right Employee Performance Management solution for your business? buyers like you are primarily concerned about the real total implementation cost (TCO), full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, pros and cons. In this article we compare between the 2 software products:

How Trakstar compares with Gusto?

Trakstar: Since 2001, we've been striving to revolutionize the world of employee evaluations by creating user-friendly yet powerful performance management tools. Today, with over 800 companies worldwide using Trakstar to streamline performance appraisals and build strong goal-setting cultures, we're proud to say we’ve achieved our mission... and we’re not ...

Gusto: Gusto was started in 2011 by best friends Josh, Tomer and Eddie to help every business in the world put people first. In 2015, we expanded our payroll service to all 50 states and opened a new office in Denver. We changed our name from ZenPayroll to Gusto to celebrate our customers' courage and passion. We also added health benefits and compliance ...

Who's more expensive? Trakstar or Gusto HR?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Employee Performance Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance & support and other related services. When calculating the TCO it's important to add all of these "hidden cost" as well. We prepared a TCO calculator for Trakstar and Gusto HR.

Trakstar price starts at $4,370 per year , on a scale between 1 to 10 Trakstar is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Employee Performance Management software. Gusto HR price starts at $39 per month , when comparing Gusto HR to their competitors, the software is rated 4 - lower than the average Employee Performance Management software cost.

Bottom line: Trakstar is more expensive than Gusto HR.

Which software includes more/better features?

As with any business software solutions, it’s important to consider the features & functionality. The tool should support the processes, workflows, reports and needs that matter to your team. To help you evaluate this, we've compared Trakstar Vs. Gusto based on some of the most important and required Employee Performance Management features. Trakstar: Dashboards & KPIs, Recruiting Management, Appraisal History, Custom Rating Systems, Customizable Questions, Self-Appraisals. Gusto HR: Payroll, Human Resources, Employee Onboarding, Workforce Management, Benefits Administration.

Target customer size

Customers of the software include small and medium businesses as well as large enterprises. and Gusto HR's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.

Trakstar

ITQlick rating
(4.4/5)

starts at $4,370 per year

Trakstar is a cloud-based performance appraisal software that is designed to assist with the assessment of the performance of the employees, feedback management as well as reviews, and also an assessment of the...

Categories: Performance Management, Travel Management, HR Analytics, Employee Performance Management.

Gusto

ITQlick rating
(4.7/5)

starts at $39 per month

A well-supported team is the key to a successful business. With Gusto easy-to-use platform, you can empower your people and push your business forward.

Categories: Check Printing, Performance Management, Document Management, Human Resources, Applicant Tracking.

Compare specifications

Gusto Specifications

ITQlick Score: 99/100
ITQlick Rating: (4.7/5)
Pricing: 4/10 - average cost
Category: Human Resources -> Gusto
Company: Gusto
Pricing: starts at $39 per month
Typical customers: Small, medium and large size businesses
Platforms: Desktop, Mobile, Cloud
Links: Gusto review, Gusto pricing, Gusto alternatives

Compare features

Trakstar: 6 Features

Dashboards & KPIs
Recruiting Management
Appraisal History
Custom Rating Systems
Customizable Questions
Self-Appraisals

Gusto HR: 9 Features

Payroll
Human Resources
Employee Onboarding
Workforce Management
Benefits Administration
Applicant Tracking
Compliant With HIPAA
Business tax
Task Management
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
Trakstar
ITQlick rating
4.4/5
Score
91/100
Pricing
6.4/10
License pricing
$4,370 per year
Functionality
13
Compare
Gusto
ITQlick rating
4.7/5
Score
99/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
$39 per month
Functionality
20
Review
Performa...
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
92/100
Pricing
2.4/10
License pricing
$2 per employee/month
Functionality
21
Reviewsnap
ITQlick rating
4.4/5
Score
91/100
Pricing
5/10
License pricing
$3,040 per year
Functionality
11
Kenexa H...
ITQlick rating
4.8/5
Score
90/100
Pricing
5/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
3
Author

Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin Facebook Twitter

Shlomi holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information System Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 15 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant, and implementation expert for small, medium and large size (global) companies.