Compare UroChart and Practice fusion - Feb 2023

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - UroChart or Practice fusion?

UroChart is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Practice fusion, and Practice fusion is rated higher (99/100) than UroChart (82/100). Practice fusion offers users more features (12) than UroChart (1). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Practice fusion!

Looking for the right Electronic Health Records (EHR) solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

IntrinsiQ Vs. practice fusion

IntrinsiQ: Our comprehensive suite of software and services empowers providers nationwide to gain control of their future.

practice fusion: Our implementation specialists are here to give you as much personal guidance as your practice needs to successfully start using your new EHR.

Who is more expensive? UroChart or Practice fusion?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Electronic Health Records (EHR) software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for UroChart and Practice fusion.

UroChart accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 UroChart is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Electronic Health Records (EHR) software. Practice fusion price starts at $149 per provider/month , When comparing Practice fusion to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Electronic Health Records (EHR) software cost.

Bottom line: UroChart is more expensive than Practice fusion.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared UroChart Vs. Practice fusion based on some of the most important and required Electronic Health Records (EHR) features.

UroChart: Medical.

Practice fusion: Basic Reports, Data Import/Export, Online Customer Support, Appointment Management, Charting.

Target customer size

UroChart's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses,

Practice Fusion Medical Software serves a wide range of healthcare providers, including primary care physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and specialists such as dermatologists, psychiatrists, and oncologists.