Compare Buffer and UberVU - Jan 2023
Compare PricingWe publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Buffer or UberVU?
UberVU is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Buffer, and Buffer is rated higher (86/100) than UberVU (79/100). UberVU offers users more features (7) than Buffer (5).
Looking for the right Social Marketing solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Buffer Vs. UberVU
Buffer: We designed Buffer to offer you a both personal and yet more efficient solution to handle sharing on social media. Buffer makes your life easier with a smarter way to schedule the great content you find. Fill up your Buffer at one time in the day and Buffer automagically posts them for you through the day. Simply keep that Buffer topped up to ha...
UberVU : uberVU was built with the understanding that marketers shouldn't waste time running reports and numbers in 10 different dashboards just to get a sense of what's going on. Ubervu delivers monitoring, engagement, collaboration and reporting in a single dashboard
Who is more expensive? Buffer or UberVU?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Social Marketing software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Buffer and UberVU.
Buffer price starts at $5 per month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Buffer is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Social Marketing software. UberVU price starts at $99 per user/month , When comparing UberVU to its competitors, the software is rated 6 - similar to the average Social Marketing software cost.
Bottom line: UberVU is more expensive than Buffer.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared Buffer Vs. UberVU based on some of the most important and required Social Marketing features.
Buffer: Blogger Integration, Business Content Sharing, Facebook Integration, LinkedIn Integration, Twitter Integration.
UberVU: Campaign Management, Social Media, Blogger Integration, Business Content Sharing, Facebook Integration.
Target customer size
Buffer is perfect for companies of all shapes and sizes. UberVU is best used by customers who want to learn about how their company or brand is performing on social media.
Compare specifications
Buffer Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 86/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
Category: | Social Marketing -> Buffer review |
Company: | Buffer |
Pricing: | starts at $5 per month |
Typical customers: | SMBs |
Platforms: | Desktop |
Links: | Buffer review, Buffer pricing, Buffer alternatives |
UberVU Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 79/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 6/10 - average cost |
Category: | Social Media Management -> UberVU review |
Company: | UberVU |
Pricing: | starts at $99 per user/month |
Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Desktop, Cloud |
Links: | UberVU review, UberVU pricing, UberVU alternatives |
Compare features
Buffer: 5 Features
UberVU: 7 Features
Auditor - Shlomi Lavi
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.