Compare Applicant Tracking and Hired - Jun 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Applicant Tracking or Hired?

Hired is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Applicant Tracking, and Hired is rated higher (87/100) than Applicant Tracking (55/100). Applicant Tracking offers users more features (3) than Hired (0).

Looking for the right Recruitment solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

ApplicantStack Vs. Hired, Inc

ApplicantStack: ApplicantStack is affordable and easy-to-use Applicant Tracking and Recruitment software that is designed for small to mid-size businesses and recruiters. With ApplicantStack you can create online job applications, manage resumes, create screening questionnaires, create a career site/job board, manage hiring workflow, search resumes, track complian...

Hired, Inc: Hired is a career marketplace for the world's knowledge workers. Starting with in-demand tech and sales roles, we’re bringing together job seekers with the companies who want to hire them. Users on the Hired platform receive objective guidance throughout the interview process from a dedicated Talent Advocate, as well as the ability to compare ne...

Who is more expensive? Applicant Tracking or Hired?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Recruitment software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Applicant Tracking and Hired.

Applicant Tracking price starts at $65 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Applicant Tracking Software is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Recruitment software. Hired price starts at $995 per month , When comparing Hired to its competitors, the software is rated 6 - similar to the average Recruitment software cost.

Bottom line: Hired is more expensive than Applicant Tracking.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Applicant Tracking Vs. Hired based on some of the most important and required Recruitment features.

Applicant Tracking: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.

Hired: We are still working to collect the list of features for Hired.

Target customer size

Applicant Tracking's typical customers include: Start up, Small business, Medium business, Large business, and Hired's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.