Compare Applicant Tracking and KPA HR - Mar 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Applicant Tracking or KPA HR?

KPA HR is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Applicant Tracking, and KPA HR is rated higher (92/100) than Applicant Tracking (55/100). Applicant Tracking offers users more features (3) than KPA HR (0).

Looking for the right Recruitment solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

ApplicantStack Vs. KPA

ApplicantStack: ApplicantStack is affordable and easy-to-use Applicant Tracking and Recruitment software that is designed for small to mid-size businesses and recruiters. With ApplicantStack you can create online job applications, manage resumes, create screening questionnaires, create a career site/job board, manage hiring workflow, search resumes, track complian...

KPA: KPA delivers Environmental Health & Safety, HR Management and F&I Compliance programs that help our clients achieve regulatory compliance, control risk, protect their assets and effectively manage people through a combination of innovative software, award winning training and on-site consulting.

Who is more expensive? Applicant Tracking or KPA Human Resource Manager?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Recruitment software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Applicant Tracking and KPA Human Resource Manager.

Applicant Tracking price starts at $65 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Applicant Tracking Software is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Recruitment software. KPA Human Resource Manager accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Applicant Tracking Software is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Recruitment software.

Bottom line: KPA Human Resource Manager is more expensive than Applicant Tracking.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Applicant Tracking Vs. KPA HR based on some of the most important and required Recruitment features.

Applicant Tracking: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.

KPA Human Resource Manager: We are still working to collect the list of features for KPA Human Resource Manager.

Target customer size

Applicant Tracking's typical customers include: Start up, Small business, Medium business, Large business, and KPA Human Resource Manager's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.