Compare Attendance on Demand and Deputy - Jul 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Attendance on Demand or Deputy?

Deputy is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Attendance on Demand, and Deputy is rated higher (90/100) than Attendance on Demand (82/100). Deputy offers users more features (10) than Attendance on Demand (4). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Deputy!

Looking for the right Time Tracking solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Attendance on Demand Inc. Vs. Deputy.Com

Attendance on Demand Inc.: Attendance on Demand is a rapidly deployed, cloud-based time and attendance system that minimizes a company’s risk and technology investment while providing advanced features for securely managing labor data. With over 30 years in the time and attendance industry, the company’s founders have evolved product offerings from mechanical time clocks to ...

Deputy.Com: Deputy was founded and created in 2008 by aviation entrepreneur Steve Shelley and technologist Ashik Ahmed. The genesis of our company was a work scheduling platform for an Australian airline ground services company. We have transformed Deputy into a platform that has social, mobile and cloud technologies at the centre of our offering. Our go...

Who is more expensive? Attendance on Demand or Deputy?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Time Tracking software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Attendance on Demand and Deputy.

Attendance on Demand price starts at $2 per employee/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Attendance on Demand is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Time Tracking software. Deputy price starts at $2.50 per user/month , When comparing Deputy to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Time Tracking software cost.

Bottom line: Attendance on Demand cost is around the same cost of Deputy.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Attendance on Demand Vs. Deputy based on some of the most important and required Time Tracking features.

Attendance on Demand: Employee Scheduling, Offline Timesheets, Online Timesheets, Attendance Tracking.

Deputy: Basic Reports, Data Import/Export, Online Customer Support, Automated Scheduling, Employee Scheduling.

Target customer size

Attendance on Demand's typical customers include: SMBs, Deputy is suitable for small and midsize companies like storage firm, restaurants and healthcare solutions.