Compare Attendance on Demand and Epicor HCM - Jul 2022
Compare PricingWe publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Attendance on Demand or Epicor HCM?
Epicor HCM is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Attendance on Demand, and Epicor HCM is rated higher (92/100) than Attendance on Demand (82/100). Epicor HCM offers users more features (10) than Attendance on Demand (4).
Looking for the right Time Tracking solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Attendance on Demand Inc. Vs. Epicor Software Corporation
Attendance on Demand Inc.: Attendance on Demand is a rapidly deployed, cloud-based time and attendance system that minimizes a company’s risk and technology investment while providing advanced features for securely managing labor data. With over 30 years in the time and attendance industry, the company’s founders have evolved product offerings from mechanical time clocks to ...
Epicor Software Corporation: Our commitment to providing world-class software and innovative technologies. The global infrastructure and experience to support new companies, regional companies and global affiliates. The determination to achieve superior customer service by a very high customer satisfaction. The strength, vision and profitability in order to act as a long-term ...
Who is more expensive? Attendance on Demand or Epicor HCM?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Time Tracking software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Attendance on Demand and Epicor HCM.
Attendance on Demand price starts at $2 per employee/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Attendance on Demand is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Time Tracking software. Epicor HCM accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Attendance on Demand is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Time Tracking software.
Bottom line: Epicor HCM is more expensive than Attendance on Demand.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared Attendance on Demand Vs. Epicor HCM based on some of the most important and required Time Tracking features.
Attendance on Demand: Employee Scheduling, Offline Timesheets, Online Timesheets, Attendance Tracking.
Epicor HCM: Appraisal Performance, Benefits Administration, Employee Self-Service, HR Management, LMS.
Target customer size
Attendance on Demand's typical customers include: SMBs, Epicor HCM is ideal for small to big companies that would like to improve the management of their human resources.
Epicor HCM
Epicor HCM is a cloud-based HCM solution which helps automate and HR processes in midsize and enterprise-level companies. The solution enables the user to manage, track and analyze all your employee data.
PriceDemoCompare specifications
Attendance on Demand Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 82/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
Category: | Time Tracking -> Attendance on Demand review |
Company: | Attendance on Demand Inc. |
Pricing: | starts at $2 per employee/month |
Typical customers: | SMBs |
Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
Links: | Attendance on Demand review, Attendance on Demand pricing, Attendance on Demand alternatives |
Epicor HCM Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 92/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 10/10 - high cost |
Category: | Human Resources -> Epicor HCM review |
Company: | Epicor Software Corporation |
Typical customers: | Medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
Links: | Epicor HCM review, Epicor HCM pricing, Epicor HCM alternatives |
Compare features
Attendance on Demand: 4 Features
Epicor HCM: 10 Features
Auditor - Shlomi Lavi
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.