Shlomi Lavi /
Apr 05, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - FieldAware or McCormick?
McCormick is more expensive to implement (TCO) than FieldAware, and FieldAware is rated higher (91/100) than McCormick (89/100). McCormick offers users more features (8) than FieldAware (0).
Looking for the right Field Service solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
FieldAware Vs. McCormick
FieldAware: We are re-shaping the field service industry! Our made-for-mobile, cloud-based software was designed from the ground up to provide ease of use with incredible flexibility – a combination that enables field service organizations to amaze their customers, astonish the staff and surprise the competition. Our software was architected as a mobile platfo...
McCormick: McCormick Brings Passion to Flavor™nSince 1889, McCormick has been the Company to turn to for flavor expertise. Today the world relies on our treasured consumer brands, trusted ingredients and culinary know-how.nnRetail outlets, food manufacturers and food service businesses - they all depend on our spices, seasonings and flavorings. McCormick i...
Who is more expensive? FieldAware or McCormick?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Field Service software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for FieldAware and McCormick.
FieldAware price starts at $70 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 FieldAware is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Field Service software. McCormick accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 FieldAware is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Field Service software.
Bottom line: McCormick is more expensive than FieldAware.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared FieldAware Vs. McCormick based on some of the most important and required Field Service features.
FieldAware: We are still working to collect the list of features for FieldAware.
McCormick: Accounting Management, Bidding, Change Orders, Cost Management, Estimating.
Target customer size
Field aware is suitable for companies that provide services that might require on field maintenance. The McCormick software is used best for commercial, industrial, and residential electrical contractors.