Compare FUEL CYCLE and InMoment Employee Engagement - May 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - FUEL CYCLE or InMoment Employee Engagement?

InMoment Employee Engagement is more expensive to implement (TCO) than FUEL CYCLE, and InMoment Employee Engagement is rated higher (84/100) than FUEL CYCLE (55/100). FUEL CYCLE offers users more features (1) than InMoment Employee Engagement (0).

Looking for the right Customer Experience Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

FUEL CYCLE Vs. InMoment

FUEL CYCLE: Fuel Cycle empowers the entire organization with a deep, on-demand market understanding to solve the hardest research problems businesses face. Do not settle for disconnected products, trackers, and tools — take control of continuous research, automated, fully integrated, in one research software.

InMoment: InMoment™ is a cloud-based customer experience (CX) optimization platform that helps brands leverage customer and employee data to inform better business decisions, and create high-value relationships. Through its Experience Hub™, InMoment provides Voice of Customer (VoC), Social Reviews & Advocacy, and Employee Engagement solutions, as well as str...

Who is more expensive? FUEL CYCLE or InMoment Employee Engagement?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Customer Experience Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for FUEL CYCLE and InMoment Employee Engagement.

FUEL CYCLE accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 FUEL CYCLE is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Customer Experience Management software. InMoment Employee Engagement accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 FUEL CYCLE is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Customer Experience Management software.

Bottom line: InMoment Employee Engagement is more expensive than FUEL CYCLE.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared FUEL CYCLE Vs. InMoment Employee Engagement based on some of the most important and required Customer Experience Management features.

FUEL CYCLE: Marketing.

InMoment Employee Engagement: We are still working to collect the list of features for InMoment Employee Engagement.

Target customer size

FUEL CYCLE's typical customers include: SMBs, and InMoment Employee Engagement's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.