Shlomi Lavi /
Feb 25, 2023
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - HARP or Athena collecter?
Athena collecter is more expensive to implement (TCO) than HARP, and HARP is rated higher (92/100) than Athena collecter (87/100). Athena collecter offers users more features (5) than HARP (0).
Looking for the right Medical Billing solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Quadax Vs. Athenahealth
Quadax: From the very beginning, Quadax has embraced innovation. The quest for new technologies, process improvements, and superior customer service has been a driving force since our founding in 1973. Although the healthcare billing industry has undergone staggering changes over the last forty years, Quadax has continued to thrive because we understand wh...
Athenahealth: athenahealth delivers cloud-based services for EHR, practice management and care coordination. Our mission is to be caregivers' most trusted service, helping them do well doing the right thing.
Who is more expensive? HARP or Athena collecter?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Medical Billing software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for HARP and Athena collecter.
HARP price starts at $39.10 per license , On a scale between 1 to 10 HARP is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Medical Billing software. Athena collecter accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 HARP is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Medical Billing software.
Bottom line: HARP cost is around the same cost of Athena collecter.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared HARP Vs. Athena collecter based on some of the most important and required Medical Billing features.
HARP: We are still working to collect the list of features for HARP.
Athena collecter: 24/7 Telephone Support, Daily Schedule/To-Do, Mobile Access, Online Customer Support, Telephone Customer Support.
Target customer size
HARP Medical Billing software serves a variety of customers in the healthcare industry, including hospitals, medical practices, and billing services. Athena Collector is a suitable solution for small and medium medical practices.