Compare test IO and Asana - Feb 2023

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Feb 28, 2023

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - test IO or Asana?

test IO is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Asana, and Asana is rated higher (97/100) than test IO (84/100). Asana offers users more features (6) than test IO (0). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Asana!

Looking for the right Bug Tracking solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

test IO Vs. Asana

test IO: test IO was founded in 2011. We’re located in San Francisco and Berlin.We help businesses to ship better apps with fewer bugs.

Asana: We do things together by aligning our energy towards a common goal, breaking the effort into parts, then marching towards the goal as one. But too often, the friction of coordination, of communicating the right amount of information, to the right people, at the right time, in the right place, gets in the way. This friction lowers our collective pro...

Who is more expensive? test IO or Asana?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Bug Tracking software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for test IO and Asana.

test IO price starts at $2,000 per feature/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 test IO is rated 10, which is much higher than the average cost of Bug Tracking software. Asana price starts at $10.99 per user/month , When comparing Asana to its competitors, the software is rated 6 - similar to the average Bug Tracking software cost.

Bottom line: test IO is more expensive than Asana.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared test IO Vs. Asana based on some of the most important and required Bug Tracking features.

test IO: We are still working to collect the list of features for test IO.

Asana: Document Management, Issue Tracking, Project Management, Resource Management, Scheduling.

Target customer size

The typical customers who benefit from using test IO are those belonging to small to medium-sized business as well as large enterprises mainly in the field of software repair.

Asana Project Management software is used by a wide range of customers in different industries, including technology, healthcare, finance, marketing, and education.



test IO

ITQlick rating
(4.8/5)

starts at $2,000 per feature/month

This app is all about crowd testing. Professionals are called upon because of their innate skills and great judgment calls. Because of the streamlined features, users have a very easy time applying and using te...

Categories: Ticket Management, IT Management, Bug Tracking, Web Load Testing.

Asana

ITQlick rating
(4.4/5)

starts at $10.99 per user/month

Asana software is a solution that manages projects and work teams. The solution offers a number of capabilities that include a timeline tool that creates a plan that shows you how the pieces of your project fit...

Categories: Team Collaboration, File Sharing, Engineering requirements, Time and Attendance, Bug Tracking.

Compare specifications

Compare features

test IO: 0 Features

We are working to collect the list of features

Asana: 6 Features

Document Management
Issue Tracking
Project Management
Resource Management
Scheduling
Task Management
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
test IO
ITQlick rating
4.8/5
Score
84/100
Pricing
10/10
License pricing
$2,000 per feature/month
Functionality
7
Compare
Asana
ITQlick rating
4.4/5
Score
97/100
Pricing
6/10
License pricing
$10.99 per user/month
Functionality
20
Review
DevTrack
ITQlick rating
3.5/5
Score
83/100
Pricing
6/10
License pricing
$20 per user/month
Functionality
6
Bugzilla
ITQlick rating
4.2/5
Score
81/100
Pricing
3/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
5
SpiraTeam
ITQlick rating
4.1/5
Score
79/100
Pricing
3.8/10
License pricing
$43.50 per user/month
Functionality
16

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.