Shlomi Lavi /
Feb 28, 2023
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - test IO or Asana?
test IO is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Asana, and Asana is rated higher (97/100) than test IO (84/100). Asana offers users more features (6) than test IO (0). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Asana!
Looking for the right Bug Tracking solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
test IO Vs. Asana
test IO: test IO was founded in 2011.
We’re located in San Francisco and Berlin.We help businesses to ship better apps with fewer bugs.
Asana: We do things together by aligning our energy towards a common goal, breaking the effort into parts, then marching towards the goal as one. But too often, the friction of coordination, of communicating the right amount of information, to the right people, at the right time, in the right place, gets in the way. This friction lowers our collective pro...
Who is more expensive? test IO or Asana?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Bug Tracking software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for test IO and Asana.
test IO price starts at $2,000 per feature/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 test IO is rated 10, which is much higher than the average cost of Bug Tracking software. Asana price starts at $10.99 per user/month , When comparing Asana to its competitors, the software is rated 6 - similar to the average Bug Tracking software cost.
Bottom line: test IO is more expensive than Asana.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared test IO Vs. Asana based on some of the most important and required Bug Tracking features.
test IO: We are still working to collect the list of features for test IO.
Asana: Document Management, Issue Tracking, Project Management, Resource Management, Scheduling.
Target customer size
The typical customers who benefit from using test IO are those belonging to small to medium-sized business as well as large enterprises mainly in the field of software repair.
Asana Project Management software is used by a wide range of customers in different industries, including technology, healthcare, finance, marketing, and education.