Compare Trakstar and CAMMS Evaluation - Oct 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Trakstar or CAMMS Evaluation?

CAMMS Evaluation is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Trakstar, and Trakstar is rated higher (91/100) than CAMMS Evaluation (80/100). Trakstar offers users more features (6) than CAMMS Evaluation (2). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Trakstar!

Looking for the right Employee Performance Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Trakstar Vs. CAMMS

Trakstar: Since 2001, we've been striving to revolutionize the world of employee evaluations by creating user-friendly yet powerful performance management tools. Today, with over 800 companies worldwide using Trakstar to streamline performance appraisals and build strong goal-setting cultures, we're proud to say we’ve achieved our mission... and we’re not ...

CAMMS: CAMMS drives organisations from strategy to reality with its world leading suite of Enterprise Performance Management (EPM) and Business Intelligence (BI) solutions. Using a unique blend of strong conceptual understanding and technical expertise, CAMMS empowers companies by helping you visualise the “bigger picture” with fully integrated systems...

Who is more expensive? Trakstar or CAMMS Personnel Evaluation System?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Employee Performance Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Trakstar and CAMMS Personnel Evaluation System.

Trakstar price starts at $4,370 per year , On a scale between 1 to 10 Trakstar is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Employee Performance Management software. CAMMS Personnel Evaluation System accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Trakstar is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Employee Performance Management software.

Bottom line: CAMMS Personnel Evaluation System is more expensive than Trakstar.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Trakstar Vs. CAMMS Evaluation based on some of the most important and required Employee Performance Management features.

Trakstar: Dashboards & KPIs, Recruiting Management, Appraisal History, Custom Rating Systems, Customizable Questions, Self-Appraisals.

CAMMS Personnel Evaluation System: Employee Self-Service, Business performance management.

Target customer size

Customers of the software include small and medium businesses as well as large enterprises. The software is a viable solution for businesses of all sizes without any restriction on industrial affiliation.