Compare ProfileXT and KPA HR - Mar 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - ProfileXT or KPA HR?

KPA HR is more expensive to implement (TCO) than ProfileXT, and KPA HR is rated with the same score (92/100) as ProfileXT (92/100).

Looking for the right Pre-employment Testing solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Profiles International Vs. KPA

Profiles International: We provide assessment solutions that help organizations select the right people for the right job and develop them to their full potential. We assist clients throughout all phases of the employee life cycle to enhance the productivity and performance of individuals, teams, and organizations.

KPA: KPA delivers Environmental Health & Safety, HR Management and F&I Compliance programs that help our clients achieve regulatory compliance, control risk, protect their assets and effectively manage people through a combination of innovative software, award winning training and on-site consulting.

Who is more expensive? ProfileXT or KPA Human Resource Manager?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Pre-employment Testing software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for ProfileXT and KPA Human Resource Manager.

ProfileXT accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 ProfileXT is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Pre-employment Testing software. KPA Human Resource Manager accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 ProfileXT is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Pre-employment Testing software.

Bottom line: KPA Human Resource Manager is more expensive than ProfileXT.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared ProfileXT Vs. KPA HR based on some of the most important and required Pre-employment Testing features.

ProfileXT: We are still working to collect the list of features for ProfileXT.

KPA Human Resource Manager: We are still working to collect the list of features for KPA Human Resource Manager.

Target customer size

The software is a viable product for businesses of all sizes with background in a variety of industries. and KPA Human Resource Manager's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.